Delafuente

(PC) Harris v. Delafuente

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:24-cv-00120California658 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARVIN HARRIS, No. 1:24-cv-00120-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

10 v. TO THIS ACTION 11 L. DELAFUENTE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

12 Defendants. ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 (ECF No. 4) 14 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 16 filed the instant action on January 26, 2024. 17 On January 29, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee or submit an 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has failed 19 to comply with the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. Therefore, on March 25, 2024, 20 the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 4.) 21 Plaintiff failed to respond the order to show cause and the time to do so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.