Arviza
(HC) Morales v. Arviza
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2 3 4 5 6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 CRISTIAN STEVE HERAS MORALES, Case No. 1:23-cv-01283-JLT-EPG-HC
12 Petitioner, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
13 v. (ECF No. 17) 14 M. ARVIZA,
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
15 Respondent.
16 17 Petitioner Cristian Steve Heras Morales is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a 18 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On March 13, 2024,1 the undersigned issued findings and recommendation 20 recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted based on nonexhaustion. (ECF 21 No. 17.) The Court found: 22 Although the petition alleges that Petitioner did not pursue further administrative appeals to the Regional Director or General Counsel 23 because the BP–9 “was rejected based on false pretense claiming [Petitioner] did not file a BP 8 which is not true,” (ECF No. 1 at 4), 24 Petitioner has not demonstrated that the allegedly improper denial of the BP–9 rendered the administrative remedy process effectively 25 unavailable or otherwise…