(HC)Canderlario Vargas v. James Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:21-cv-00655California593 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CANDELARIO VARGAS, No. 1:21-cv-00655-KES-SAB (HC) 10 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

11 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

12 JAMES ROBERTSON, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

13 Respondent. (Doc. 37) 14 15 16 Candelario Vargas (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 17 writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. This matter was referred to 18 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 23, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 20 recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Doc. 37. 21 The findings and recommendations were served on the parties1 and contained notice that any 22 objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.