Tormey

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE No. 2:23-cv-02121-TLN-AC

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 ADAM TORMEY dba GOLDEN STATE 15 BABY BARRIER, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Adam Tormey dba Golden State Baby 19 Barrier, C.A. Tormey Construction, Inc. dba Golden State Baby Barrier, and C.A. Tormey 20 Construction, Inc. dba C.A. Tormey Remodeling’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Stay. 21 (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff State National Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. 22 (ECF No. 11.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 13.) For the foregoing reasons, the Court 23 GRANTS Defendants’ motion. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 This action arises out of an insurance coverage dispute about whether Plaintiff, the 3 insurer, has a duty to defend and indemnify Defendants, the insureds, in a state court personal 4 injury action under commercial general liability policies. (ECF…