Mai

(PS) Dozier v. Mai

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20241:23-cv-00759California5,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE DOZIER, 1:23-cv-00759-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. CHI MAI, ET AL., Defendants. 16 On May 16, 2023, plaintiff Lee Dozier (“plaintiff”) filed this action asserting violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Unruh Civil Rights Act. (ECF No. 1.) Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendant Chi Mai (“defendant”). (ECF No. 18.) For the reasons discussed below, the court now recommends that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted in part and denied in part.

1 This motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(19). After defendant failed to file an opposition to 25 the motion in accordance with Local Rule 230(c), the motion was submitted on the record and written briefing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 22.)

2 Plaintiff named…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.