Medina
Medina v. Mapes
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO
SUPPLEMENT ITS OPPOSITION TO
13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO
SUBMIT AMENDED EXPERT REPORTS
14
COURTNEY L. MAPES, M.D. THAT COMPLY WITH THE FEDERAL
15 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITHIN 30 Defendant. DAYS 16 DEADLINE: May 17, 2024 17 18 Plaintiffs Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva proceed pro se on claims for medical 19 negligence, lack of informed consent, and loss of consortium against Defendant Courtney L. 20 Mapes, M.D. (ECF No. 1). 21 Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims, primarily arguing that the 22 undisputed facts demonstrate that Defendant did not breach the standard or care and that 23 Defendant’s acts or omissions did not cause Plaintiff’s injuries. (ECF No. 52). In opposition, 24 Plaintiffs submitted the expert report of Mark Needham, M.D., and the rebuttal expert report of 25 Daria…