Medina

Medina v. Mapes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:21-cv-00844California1,161 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

SUPPLEMENT ITS OPPOSITION TO

13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO

SUBMIT AMENDED EXPERT REPORTS

COURTNEY L. MAPES, M.D. THAT COMPLY WITH THE FEDERAL

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITHIN 30 Defendant. DAYS 16 DEADLINE: May 17, 2024 17 Plaintiffs Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva proceed pro se on claims for medical negligence, lack of informed consent, and loss of consortium against Defendant Courtney L. Mapes, M.D. (ECF No. 1). Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims, primarily arguing that the undisputed facts demonstrate that Defendant did not breach the standard or care and that Defendant’s acts or omissions did not cause Plaintiff’s injuries. (ECF No. 52). In opposition, Plaintiffs submitted the expert report of Mark Needham, M.D., and the rebuttal expert report of Daria…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.