Block

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01048-KES-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT JIWAN KUMAR, individually and dba (Doc. 36) DIDIER’S LIQUOR, et al., 15 Defendants 16 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Hendrik Block’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 36.) Defendants Jiwan Kumar, individually and d/b/a Didier’s Liquor, and Santosh Kumar (collectively, “Defendants”) opposed the motion, and Plaintiff replied. (Docs. 39, 40.) The Court found the motion suitable for decision without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. 43.) Counsel for Defendants subsequently filed a notice of clarification confirming that she represented both Defendants Jiwan Kumar, individually and d/b/a Didier’s Liquor, and Santosh Kumar. (Doc. 44.) Having considered the motion, opposition, reply, and record in this case, Plaintiff’s motion…