Block

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01048-KES-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 JIWAN KUMAR, individually and dba (Doc. 36) DIDIER’S LIQUOR, et al., 15 Defendants 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Hendrik Block’s motion for leave to file a 18 second amended complaint. (Doc. 36.) Defendants Jiwan Kumar, individually and d/b/a Didier’s 19 Liquor, and Santosh Kumar (collectively, “Defendants”) opposed the motion, and Plaintiff 20 replied. (Docs. 39, 40.) The Court found the motion suitable for decision without oral argument, 21 pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. 43.) Counsel for Defendants subsequently filed a notice of 22 clarification confirming that she represented both Defendants Jiwan Kumar, individually and 23 d/b/a Didier’s Liquor, and Santosh Kumar. (Doc. 44.) 24 Having considered the motion, opposition, reply, and record in this case, Plaintiff’s 25 motion…