Foster

(PC) Plett v. Foster

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:22-cv-01261California840 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIKEL PLETT, Case No. 1:22-cv-01261-KES-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RECALLING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (Doc. No. 17) 14 S. FOSTER, WALLARD, and JOHN DOE, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY Defendants. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS 16 AND CLAIMS

17 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED

18 DEFENDANT 19 (Doc. No. 21) 20 21 Plaintiff Mikel Plett, a prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 22 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 29, 2023, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s 23 Complaint. (Doc. No. 12). As discussed in this Court’s screening order, the Complaint states a 24 cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive use of force claim against Defendant S. Foster but no 25 other claim. (Id. at 8). Specifically, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.