Tanton

(PC) Campbell v. Tanton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20242:18-cv-00671California6,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SENARBLE CAMPBELL, No. 2:18-cv-00671-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSHUA J. TANTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through appointed counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s third amended complaint alleging Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against defendants Becerra, Martin, Kenton, and Herrera; excessive force claims against defendants Tanton, Hammer, Pierce, Rashev, and Leech; a failure to protect claim against defendant Ellin; and, state law medical negligence claims against defendants Martin and Kenton. Defendants Becerra, Martin, Kenton, Herrera, and Pierce filed a motion for summary judgment that is now before the court. ECF No. 162. The motion has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 166-169. Oral argument was heard on March 20, 2024. ECF No. 171. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.