Tanton
(PC) Campbell v. Tanton
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SENARBLE CAMPBELL, No. 2:18-cv-00671-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JOSHUA J. TANTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through appointed counsel in this civil rights action 18 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s third amended 19 complaint alleging Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against defendants Becerra, 20 Martin, Kenton, and Herrera; excessive force claims against defendants Tanton, Hammer, Pierce, 21 Rashev, and Leech; a failure to protect claim against defendant Ellin; and, state law medical 22 negligence claims against defendants Martin and Kenton. Defendants Becerra, Martin, Kenton, 23 Herrera, and Pierce filed a motion for summary judgment that is now before the court. ECF No. 24 162. The motion has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 166-169. Oral argument was heard on March 25 20, 2024. ECF No. 171. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted…