(PS) Iliya v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:22-cv-01305California1,316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAUDA ILIYA, No. 2:22-cv-1305-KJM-CSK PS Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

CONTESTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

v. JURISDICTION COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF No. 30.) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dauda Iliya, who proceeds without the aid of counsel, filed his complaint in July 2022 against the County of Sacramento and three individual defendants. (ECF No. 1 (Compl.).) Given that Plaintiff proceeds without counsel, the case was referred to the assigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Under the Local Rule referral, the magistrate judge is to resolve all non-dispositive matters by order, and all dispositive matters by findings and recommendations. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion contesting the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. (ECF No. 30.) On January 31, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge held an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.