(PS) Iliya v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:22-cv-01305California1,316 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAUDA ILIYA, No. 2:22-cv-1305-KJM-CSK PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

CONTESTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13 v. JURISDICTION 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF No. 30.) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dauda Iliya, who proceeds without the aid of counsel, filed his complaint 18 in July 2022 against the County of Sacramento and three individual defendants. (ECF 19 No. 1 (Compl.).) Given that Plaintiff proceeds without counsel, the case was referred to 20 the assigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Under the Local Rule referral, the magistrate 22 judge is to resolve all non-dispositive matters by order, and all dispositive matters by 23 findings and recommendations. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion 24 contesting the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. (ECF No. 30.) 25 On January 31, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge held an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.