(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:23-cv-01490California6,478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICHARD HAROLD LANDIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01490-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

CORRECTIONS AND DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

REHABILITATION, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE

Defendants. TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 8) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 I. Background Plaintiff Richard Harold Landis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 4, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20, failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and was filed prematurely without first exhausting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.