(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RICHARD HAROLD LANDIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01490-BAM (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
12 v. ACTION 13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
CORRECTIONS AND DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
14 REHABILITATION, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE
15 Defendants. TO PROSECUTE 16 (ECF No. 8) 17 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 19 I. Background 20 Plaintiff Richard Harold Landis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 21 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 On March 4, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply 23 with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20, failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, 24 and was filed prematurely without first exhausting…