Cisneros

(PC) Moten v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:24-cv-00022California501 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARROD MOTEN, No. 1:24-cv-00022 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (Doc. 10) 14 THERESA CISNEROS, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S FILING FEE TO BE PAID IN

15 Defendants. FULL BY MAY 23, 2024 16 SHARROD MOTEN, No. 1:24-cv-00043 JLT GSA (PC) 17 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

18 v. (Doc. 11) 19 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S FILING FEE TO BE PAID IN

20 Defendants. FULL BY MAY 23, 2024 21 22 23 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 24 has requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in both the 25 above-referenced matters. (See Cisneros, Doc. 4; Pfeiffer, Doc. 6 (applications to proceed in 26 forma pauperis).) The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 27 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 28 On March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.