(PC) Nelson v. The People of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20242:23-cv-02935California406 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WARREN ANDREW NELSON, No. 2:23-cv-2935 AC P 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 20, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis application or pay the filing fee and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 8. After plaintiff failed to file a 20 completed application or pay the fee, he was given an additional twenty-one days to comply and 21 warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 22 without further warning. ECF No. 10. The twenty-one-day period expired without plaintiff filing 23 an application or paying the fee. Instead, he filed a document that appeared to be related to his 24 state habeas proceedings. ECF No. 11. Because it appeared that plaintiff may have submitted the 25 wrong documentation, he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.