Laursen
(PC) Miles v. Laursen
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Georgia Miles, No. 2:23-cv-00663-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Phillipa Laursen, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, objects to the dismissal of her case, which 18 | this court construes as a motion to reconsider. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies 19 | plaintiff's motion. 20 Plaintiff filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See First Am. Compl., ECF 21 | No.7. On July 25, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed without 22 | prejudice for failure to file an in forma pauperis application. See First F&Rs, ECF No. 15. 23 | Plaintiff filed objections, see Obj., ECF Nos. 17, 18, and an application to proceed in forma 24 | pauperis, see Appl., ECF No. 16. On October 2, 2023, the undersigned declined to adopt the 25 | magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations given plaintiff's new application. …