Unknown

(PC) Corral v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:23-cv-01058California328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:23-cv-1058 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a Sacramento County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 3, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint which the court now screens. As with the original complaint, plaintiff fails to identify any defendants in the amended complaint. Because plaintiff fails to allege any party violated his federal rights, the amended complaint must be dismissed. The court will not grant leave to amend a second time as that appears to be futile. ///// ///// ///// ///// In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. Plaintiffs amended complaint be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.