Newcomb

(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:24-cv-00413California744 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | PAUL C. BOLIN, No. 2:24-cv-0413 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER AND 14 | RACHAEL NEWCOMB, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondents, et al., 16 17 Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On February 14, 2024, the court 18 || dismissed petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus with leave to amend. 19 || Petitioner filed an amended petition on March 4, 2024. 20 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all 21 || petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the 22 || petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. 23 A petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody under a judgment of a state 24 | court can be granted only for violations of the Constitution or laws of the United States. 28 25 | USC. § 2254(a). Petitioner takes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.