Newcomb

(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:24-cv-00413California744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL C. BOLIN, No. 2:24-cv-0413 CKD P Petitioner, Vv. ORDER AND RACHAEL NEWCOMB, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents, et al., 16 Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On February 14, 2024, the court 18 || dismissed petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus with leave to amend. 19 || Petitioner filed an amended petition on March 4, 2024. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all || petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the 22 || petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody under a judgment of a state 24 court can be granted only for violations of the Constitution or laws of the United States. 28 USC. § 2254(a). Petitioner takes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.