(PS) Miller v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALAN MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-02113 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 2, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. See F&Rs, ECF No. 38. Plaintiff filed objections, see Obj., ECF No. 39, and defendant responded, see Resp., ECF No. 40. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court adopts the findings and recommendations in part. First, the court notes the Tahoe Regional Planning 27 …