Hill

(PC) Blackman v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20242:24-cv-01149California1,319 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY BLACKMAN, No. 2:24-cv-1149 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 J. HILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. Three Strikes Analysis 20 Plaintiff has not yet submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this case or 21 paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $55.00 administrative fee. However, as explained 22 below, plaintiff will not be given the opportunity to submit an application to proceed in forma 23 pauperis because he has accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and he has not shown 24 that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Instead, the court will recommend 25 that plaintiff be required to pay the $405.00 in required fees or suffer dismissal of the complaint. 26 The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) permits any court of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.