Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ZACHERY JONES, et al. (ECF No. 55) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion for summary judgment, filed April 22, 2024. (ECF No. 55.) I. DISCUSSION “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A party moving for summary judgment must include a “Statement of Undisputed Facts.” Local Rule 260(a). Furthermore, this Court's local rule requires each motion of summary judgment…