Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:21-cv-01461California1,490 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY AND

13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF Nos. 139, 143, 146) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling 20 order, filed on January 26, 2024. (ECF No. 139.) 21 I. 22 RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY 23 This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. 24 Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 25 Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) 26 On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 27 59.) 28 On June 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.