Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:21-cv-01461California2,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL, FILED ON

v. JANUARY 22, 2024 C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF No. 136) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed January 22, 2024. (ECF No. 136.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 59.) /// On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.