(PC)Moten

(PC)Moten v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20241:24-cv-00043California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARROD MOTEN, No. 1:24-cv-00022 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 10) THERESA CISNEROS, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S FILING FEE TO BE PAID IN

Defendants. FULL BY MAY 23, 2024 SHARROD MOTEN, No. 1:24-cv-00043 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 11) CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S FILING FEE TO BE PAID IN

Defendants. FULL BY MAY 23, 2024 21 22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in both the above-referenced matters. (See Cisneros, Doc. 4; Pfeiffer, Doc. 6 (applications to proceed in forma pauperis).) The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.