(PS) Melton v. Stockton Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:23-cv-01457California1,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY RUSSELL MELTON, No. 2:23-cv-1457-KJM-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On August 25, 2023, Plaintiff Anthony Russell Melton paid the filing fee and filed his First Amended Complaint.1 (ECF No. 8 (Compl.).) On November 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed a set of documents labeled “summons returned executed.” (ECF No. 9.) Thereafter, Defendant Stockton Police Department filed objections to Plaintiff’s purported service, noting the envelope did not contain a copy of the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Further, the Court noted Plaintiff simply mailed two envelopes to Defendants himself. (ECF No. 11.) By order dated December 26, 2023, the Court quashed this purported service, provided Plaintiff with standards for serving Defendants, gave Plaintiff an additional 90 days to do so, and warned that further failure to follow the rules regarding service may result in dismissal under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.