Abdulgader

(PC) Wolinski v. Abdulgader

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:21-cv-02078California854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:21-cv-02078-DJC-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ABDULBASET ABDULGADER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have filed various motions which the court will address in turn. The first motion pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for a 60 day stay of proceedings, or, in the alternative, the appointment of co-counsel during the dispositive motion phase of the case. ECF No. 55. The court first notes that the requested time period has already passed since this motion was docketed on December 27, 2023. Moreover, plaintiff does not seek an extension of any specific deadline in this case. For these reasons, the court denies the motion for a 60 day stay of proceedings. The same motion also requests the appointment of counsel. District courts lack authority…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.