(HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:24-cv-00512California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHARY LLOYD KALSO, No. 2:24-cv-0512 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner challenges his detention at the Butte County Jail. While not entirely clear, it appears he challenges the fact that he has been denied bail. Petitioner also challenges his detention in the Butte County Jail in 2:24-cv-0507 DMC. Because it appears that this action is duplicative of the earlier filed action, and because there does not appear to be good cause for permitting petitioner to proceed with two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.