Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:90-cv-00520California6,669 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Ralph Coleman, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 Gavin Newsom, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 15, 2024, the Special Master filed a request for the appointment of additional 18 | staff and for an increase in the hourly rates he and his team are paid for work and for travel time. 19 | ECF No. 8130. On the same day, defendants requested ten days to “closely review and consider 20 | the Special Master’s request, and to file a response setting forth their position.” ECF No. 8131 at 21 | 1. The court granted defendants’ request the same day, Feb. 15 Min. Order, ECF No. 8133, and 22 | defendants filed their response on February 26, 2024, ECF No. 8138.! With leave of court, 23 | Feb. 29 Min. Order, ECF No. 8141, on March 13, 2024 plaintiffs filed a response to defendants’ 24 | response, ECF No. 8156.

' On February 27, 2024, defendants filed a Notice of Errata and a corrected version of their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.