Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW CHAPMAN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01531-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, (Doc. 5) Defendant.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Matthew Chapman (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) on November 29, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On June 23, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted leave to amend. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on July 24, 2023. (Doc. 5.) The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief…