Torres

(PS) Ramos Rodriguez v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20242:24-cv-01025California1,452 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J. JESUS RAMOS RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:24-cv-1025 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 MARIA XOCHITL MEJIA TORRES, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 On April 5, 2024, plaintiff J. Jesus Ramos Rodriguez commenced this action by filing a 18 complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. 19 Accordingly, the matter has been referred to the undersigned for all purposes encompassed by 20 Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s complaint appears to concern a divorce. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) 21 at 6.1) 22 Jurisdiction is a threshold inquiry that must precede the adjudication of any case before 23 the district court. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization, 858 F.2d 24 1376, 1380 (9th Cir. 1988). Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and may adjudicate 25 only those cases authorized by federal law. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 26 27 1 Page number citations such as this are to the page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.