Puckett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jeremy Phillip Puckett, No. 2:22-cv-00350-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendants move ex parte to extend the date for discovery production the court set in its 18 prior order resolving the parties’ discovery dispute as relevant here. Ex Parte Appl., ECF No. 158. Plaintiff opposes. Ex Parte Opp’n, ECF No. 161. For the reason set forth below, the court 20 denies defendants’ application. Following defendants’ prior motion for reconsideration, this court directed defendants to “promptly comply with the magistrate judge’s order[]” and produce documents at issue within seven days. See Prior Order (Apr. 4, 2024) at 6, ECF No. 150. “When an act must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time[] with or without motion 25 or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time…