Puckett

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Jeremy Phillip Puckett, No. 2:22-cv-00350-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Defendants move ex parte to extend the date for discovery production the court set in its 18 | prior order resolving the parties’ discovery dispute as relevant here. Ex Parte Appl., ECF No. 19 | 158. Plaintiff opposes. Ex Parte Opp’n, ECF No. 161. For the reason set forth below, the court 20 | denies defendants’ application. 21 Following defendants’ prior motion for reconsideration, this court directed defendants to 22 | “promptly comply with the magistrate judge’s order[]” and produce documents at issue within 23 | seven days. See Prior Order (Apr. 4, 2024) at 6, ECF No. 150. “When an act must be done 24 | within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time[] with or without motion 25 | or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time…