Verduzco

Verduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20241:18-cv-01681California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTURO VERDUZCO, 1:18-cv-01681-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. CON AGRA FOODS PACKAGED

FOODS, LLC,

15 Defendants.

17 Defendant’s motion for a protective order related to plaintiff’s deposition of defendant’s corporate representative is pending before this court. (ECF No. 133.) Defendant filed the motion for a protective order on March 15, 2024, and noticed it for a hearing on April 10, 2024. (ECF No. 133.) The parties filed a joint statement regarding the discovery dispute on March 27, 2024. (ECF No. 134.) On April 3, 2024, plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 138.) For the reasons below, the court grants defendant’s motion for a protective order. ////

1 On April 4, 2024, undersigned took this matter under submission on the papers. (ECF No. 139.)

28 I. Motion for Protective Order A. Legal Standard A Rule 30(b)(6) deposition requires a corporation to designate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.