Biden

(HC) Bennett v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20242:23-cv-00619California800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:23-cv-00619-DAD-AC (HC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

JOE BIDEN, THIS ACTION Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 10, 19) 16 17 Petitioner David Bennett is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 6, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner’s federal habeas petition be dismissed due to petitioner’s failure to state a cognizable claim because “[t]he petition is largely unintelligible, but it appears to allege a litany of constitutional rights violations and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act stemming from competency proceedings in petitioner’s criminal case.” (Doc. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.