U.S. EEOC v. Elite Wireless Group, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity No. 2:19-cv-02187-MCE-CKD Commission, 12 ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Elite Wireless Group, Inc., et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On March 4, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 20 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 27 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 28 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations (ECF…