Mayorkas

(PS) Al Jassim v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20242:24-cv-00288California637 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ABDULLAH IMAD AL JASSIM, No. 2:24-cv-00288 KJM AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UR FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

JADDOU,

15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff filed this action on January 23, 2024 pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), asking the 19 court to conduct a hearing and make a determination on his naturalization application because 20 defendants failed to act on the application within 120 days following his naturalization interview. 21 ECF No. 1 at 1-2. On February 8, 2024, defendants, who are federal officials sued in their 22 official capacities as representatives of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), 23 moved to remand this case to USCIS under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). ECF No. 9. Plaintiff did not 24 oppose the motion. Defendants request that the court enter an order of remand pursuant to 8 25 U.S.C. § 1447(b), requiring USCIS complete the adjudication on plaintiff’s application within 15 26 days; they confirm in their reply brief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.