Puckett

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20242:22-cv-00350California1,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jeremy Phillip Puckett, No. 2:22-cv-00350-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 The magistrate judge granted plaintiff's motion to compel Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) depositions and ordered defense counsel to pay sanctions for violating the Local Rules 19 and the magistrate judge’s Standard Information requirements. Dep. Order, ECF No. 119. The magistrate judge also granted plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents, Prod. Order, ECF No. 137, and ordered defense counsel to pay additional sanctions, Sanctions Order, ECF No. 138. Defendants move for reconsideration of all three orders, First Mot., ECF No. 136; Second Mot., ECF No. 148; Third Mot., ECF No. 147, and plaintiff opposes, First Opp’n, ECF No. 146; Second Opp’n, ECF No. 156; Third Opp’n, ECF No. 157. The court denies defendants’ motions. 25 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.