Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Jeremy Phillip Puckett, No. 2:22-cv-00350-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The magistrate judge granted plaintiff's motion to compel Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 | 30(b)(6) depositions and ordered defense counsel to pay sanctions for violating the Local Rules 19 | and the magistrate judge’s Standard Information requirements. Dep. Order, ECF No. 119. The 20 | magistrate judge also granted plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents, Prod. Order, 21 | ECF No. 137, and ordered defense counsel to pay additional sanctions, Sanctions Order, ECF No. 22 | 138. Defendants move for reconsideration of all three orders, First Mot., ECF No. 136; Second 23 | Mot., ECF No. 148; Third Mot., ECF No. 147, and plaintiff opposes, First Opp’n, ECF No. 146; 24 | Second Opp’n, ECF No. 156; Third Opp’n, ECF No. 157. The court denies defendants’ motions. 25 | I. …