Gutierrez

(PC) Tri v. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20241:22-cv-00836California5,331 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LY TRI, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00836-KES-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

13 v. GRANT DEFENDANT McNUTT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS

14 C. GUTIERREZ, et al., (Doc. 16) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16

17

18 Plaintiff Ly Tri is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff filed a complaint on July 8, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Following screening and service of 22 process, the action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant 23 D. Gutierrez and Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Defendant J. McNutt. (See 24 Docs. 9 & 10.) 25 On July 26, 2023, Defendant McNutt filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter 26 jurisdiction. (See Doc. 16.) The following day, Defendant Gutierrez filed a motion to stay the 27 responsive pleading deadline pending the Court’s ruling on Defendant McNutt’s motion to 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.