Bucato

(PC) Wilson v. Bucato

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20241:23-cv-00023California866 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LUCIOUS WILSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00023-KES-HBK 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER RESETTING SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE AND PARAMETERS

15 BUCATO, J. FLORES, C. AND HUCKLEBERRY, Settlement Conference May 20, 2024 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights 20 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. The Court previously determined that this case would 21 benefit from a settlement conference. A settlement conference was subsequently set for April 18, 22 2024. The settlement conference had to be vacated due to plaintiff’s health and housing situation 23 and lack of access to property, to be continued to another date. The settlement conference will 24 be reset for May 20, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The 25 settlement conference will be conducted by remote means, with all parties appearing by Zoom 26 video conference. The Court will issue the necessary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.