Odrunia

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 1322 O St Investors LP, No. 2:24-cv-01147-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Bernardita Odrunia, 1S Defendant. 16 17 Defendant Bernardita Odrunia, proceeding pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action 18 | from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Odrunia also filed 19 | a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Mot., ECF No. 2. For the reasons below, the court 20 | remands the matter to state court and denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot. 21 When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is 22 | initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 23 | There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal question 24 | jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and (2) diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 25 Under § 1331, district…