Odrunia

(UD)(PS) 1322 O St Investors LP v. Odrunia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20242:24-cv-01147California623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1322 O St Investors LP, No. 2:24-cv-01147-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Bernardita Odrunia, 1S Defendant. 16 Defendant Bernardita Odrunia, proceeding pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action 18 from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Odrunia also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Mot., ECF No. 2. For the reasons below, the court remands the matter to state court and denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot. When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is 22 initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal question 24 jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and (2) diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Under § 1331, district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.