Gibralter, LLC v. DMS Flowers, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 GIBRALTER, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00174-CDB
12 Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
13 v.
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO
14 DMS FLOWERS, LLC., et al.,
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
15 Defendants.
ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
16
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
17 18 19 Plaintiffs Gibralter, LLC and Divinely, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action with the 20 filing of a complaint against Defendants DMS Flowers, LLC, Maria Pantoja, Samantha Andrade, 21 and Daniel Andrade (“Defendants”) on February 6, 2024. (ECF No. 1). The following day, the 22 Clerk of the Court issued summonses and the Court entered an Order setting a mandatory 23 scheduling conference for May 2, 2024 (the “Order”). (ECF Nos. 2, 3). The Order directed 24 Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of 25 service.” The Order further advised Plaintiffs that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may 26 result…