(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20242:23-cv-02339California2,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN TAYLOR MAYS, No. 2:23-cv-2339 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STANTON CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a Solano County jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is before the court. As discussed below, it is recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.