(PC) Parker v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20242:23-cv-00536California249 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN A. PARKER, No. 2:23-cv-00536-DAD-DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JEFF LYNCH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed February 23, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and sixty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Sixty days from that date have now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” 27 //// 28 //// 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.