C.H.
C.H. v. Fruitvale School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 C.H., a minor, by and through his guardian No. 1:24-cv-00001-KES-CDB ad litem CHEYENNE HARRIGER, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO 13 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO AMENDED v. MOTION TO STRIKE 14 FRUITVALE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendant. (Doc. 27) 16
17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for leave to file an untimely reply to 19 Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ amended motion to strike.1 Doc. 27. Plaintiff opposes the 20 motion. Doc. 32. The pending motion will be decided without oral argument. See L.R. 230(g). 21 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to file their reply brief to 22 Plaintiff’s opposition to the amended motion to strike. 23
24 1 Defendants filed duplicate copies of their motion for leave to file an untimely reply brief. See Docs. 26, 27. While Defendants docketed one of their motions as a motion to file an untimely 25…