(SS) Gotterson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20241:22-cv-01383California4,449 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON ANTHONY GOTTERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01383-KJM-HBK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENY

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMAND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER OF

15 SECURITY,1 SOCIAL SECURITY2 16 Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 (Doc. Nos. 14, 17) 18 19 Brandon Anthony Gotterson (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 21 supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is 22 currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. 23 (Doc. Nos. 14, 17-18). For the reasons stated, the undersigned RECOMMENDS granting 24 Plaintiff’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.