Flores

Flores v. Point Pickup Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20241:22-cv-00193California1,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEAN FLORES, on behalf of the Class and Case No. 1:22-cv-00193-JLT-SKO Class Members, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND Plaintiff, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS v. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 13 POINT PICKUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (Doc. 30) 14 Defendant. _____________________________________/

I. INTRODUCTION On April 9, 2024, Cary G. Palmer and Jimmy Macias of the law firm Jackson Lewis P.C. (“Attorneys Palmer and Macias”), attorneys for Defendant Point Pickup Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), filed the instant motion to withdraw. (Doc. 30.) Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c), any opposition to the motion by Plaintiff Jean Flores (“Plaintiff’) or Defendant was due by April 23, 2024. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed a response. (See Docket.) The matter is therefore deemed unopposed. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). After having reviewed the motion and supporting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.