Flores
Flores v. Point Pickup Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JEAN FLORES, on behalf of the Class and Case No. 1:22-cv-00193-JLT-SKO Class Members, 11 ORDER VACATING HEARING AND Plaintiff, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS v. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 13 POINT PICKUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (Doc. 30) 14 Defendant. 15 _____________________________________/
16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On April 9, 2024, Cary G. Palmer and Jimmy Macias of the law firm Jackson Lewis P.C. 18 (“Attorneys Palmer and Macias”), attorneys for Defendant Point Pickup Technologies, Inc. 19 (“Defendant”), filed the instant motion to withdraw. (Doc. 30.) Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 20 230(c), any opposition to the motion by Plaintiff Jean Flores (“Plaintiff’) or Defendant was due by 21 April 23, 2024. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed a response. (See Docket.) The matter is 22 therefore deemed unopposed. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). 23 After having reviewed the motion and supporting…