(PC) Cordova v. Wellpath Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20242:23-cv-01226California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND MARIA CORDOVA, III, No. 2:23-cv-01226 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLPATH HEALTHCARE, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a Butte County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.