Rodriguez
(PC) Tatum v. Rodriguez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DA TAEVONNE Q. TATUM, 1:24-cv-00334-EPG (PC)
11 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
12 v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
13 RODRIGUEZ, et al., RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
14 Defendants. 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
16
17 Plaintiff Da Taevonne Q. Tatum is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights lawsuit 18 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After Plaintiff failed to submit an application to proceed in 19 forma pauperis or pay the filing fee, the Court issued an order on March 22, 2024, giving Plaintiff 20 thirty days to do either and warning of dismissal if Plaintiff failed to comply. (ECF No. 6). The 21 thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, submit an IFP 22 application, or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this 24 case. 25 And IT IS…