Ceja

Ceja v. LVNV Funding LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20241:23-cv-01673California307 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 TYLER CEJA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01673-KES-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 17) 12 v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

13 LVNV FUNDING LLC, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY

14 Defendant. DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)

OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

15 PROCEDURE

16 (ECF No. 18)

17 On April 26, 2024, two identical stipulations were filed dismissing this action with 18 prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) 19 Plaintiff filed one stipulation as a “motion to dismiss” (ECF No. 17) and the second stipulation 20 as a stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. 18). The Court shall strike the improperly named “motion 21 to dismiss” (ECF No. 17) and deem the document filed as a stipulation for dismissal as the 22 operative stipulation (ECF No. 18). In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.