Taylor

(HC) Flores v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20241:23-cv-01587California857 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIX NACEDO FLORES, No. 1:23-cv-01587-JLT-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION

13 v. TO DISMISS 14 WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA, [Doc. 22] 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On November 9, 2023, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition. (Doc. 1.) On March 20 19, 2024, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 22.) Respondent seeks 21 dismissal because Petitioner was granted the relief he sought: The BOP has recomputed his 22 sentence to account for state post-arrest custody and he has been released from BOP custody as of 23 March 6, 2024. Petitioner did not file an opposition. Having reviewed the pleadings, the Court 24 will recommend that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED. 25 DISCUSSION 26 I. Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.