Muniz

(PC) Cisneros v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20241:22-cv-01601California781 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAN EL CISNEROS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01601-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

13 v. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) OF

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANT

14 JUAN MUNIZ, et al., (Doc. No. 20) 15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Dan El Cisneros, a prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2024, this Court issued an amended screening 19 order on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 18, “SAC”). As discussed in the 20 amended screening order, the Court found Plaintiff’s SAC states cognizable Eighth Amendment 21 deliberate medical indifference claims against Defendants Muniz, Gill, and Lotersztain, state law 22 medical malpractice claims against Defendants Gill, Muniz, and Lotersztain, a state law negligent 23 supervision claim against Defendant Russell, and a state law failure to summon medical care 24 claim against Defendant Muniz,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.