M.F.

M.F. v. Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:24-cv-01009California545 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 M.F., a minor, by and through his guardian ad Case No.: 2:24-cv-01009-JDP litem, JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE and 15 VANESSA DOE, [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’

EX PARTE MOTION TO PROCEED BY

16 Plaintiffs, PSEUDONYMS 17 v. 18

19

SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL

20 DISTRICT, a public entity; EMMA BLANCHE SHAFFER, an individual, MEGAN ANN 21 MESCHERY, individually and in her capacity as Principal of Loyalton High School, and 22 ROES 1 through 40, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 25

26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 On April 1, 2024, M.F., John Doe, and Vanessa Doe (“Plaintiffs”), filed a Complaint for 3 Damages. (ECF No. 1). On April 4, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Proceed by Pseudonyms in 4 place of their true and correct names. (ECF Nos. 3, 3-1). 5 “The normal presumption in litigation is that parties must use their real names.” Doe v. 6 Kamehameha Sch., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010). However, the Ninth Circuit has allowed 7 parties to use pseudonyms “in the ‘unusual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.