Martel

(HC) Poslof v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:19-cv-02321California1,387 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LONNIE LEE POSLOF, JR., No. 2:19-cv-2321 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The action proceeds on a petition challenging a 19 2018 prison disciplinary finding in which petitioner was found guilty of battery on a peace officer 20 and forfeited 150 days of good-time credits. ECF No. 1. Respondent has answered, ECF No. 11, 21 and petitioner has filed a traverse, ECF No. 16. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned 22 recommends that the petition be summarily denied for lack of jurisdiction. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Petitioner is serving an indeterminate sentence of 15 years to life sentence for oral 25 copulation/sexual penetration with a child 10 years old or younger, as well as a determinate term 26 of 12 years for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.